As we saw in the last post, global warming is taking place even on the planets on the outer fringes of our solar system. Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are not exempt. We also saw that these climate changes are not driven by our Sun alone. In fact, very little of it is caused by the increased solar activities, and this only relative to the planets close in. The solar system is crossing over an energetic threshold in the Milky Way Galaxy and into a field of electromagnetic radiation emanating from the center of the galaxy. It is this cosmic radiation that is causing climate changes on all the planets, including the Sun. (Learn more about this aspect from my first post on this series.)
Seeing the Larger Context
We are moving through space at a rapid speed and space doesn’t maintain a consistent intensity of cosmic energy. It may seem that way to us due to our relatively brief lifespan. We don’t remember anything from out of our prenatal past. We have to rely on scientists to look back technologically and on ancient records, such as the Mayans and other ancient peoples have handed down to us, mostly in the form of legends. With the Mayans, it is in the form of their “Long Count Calender.”
Then there are the four elemental creative forces of water, air, earth and fire that move in rhythmic cycles bringing with them cosmological and geophysical changes. They also bring with them genetic changes in the lifeforms on the planets. DNA is constantly being written and re-written by the Music of the Spheres to accommodate the ever changing score of the Symphony of Life under the direction of the Spirit of God the Creator, who rules the universe in which we play a co-creative role.
Well, we are designed to play a co-creative role with God. We haven’t been doing so well in that department but rather have sought to create and rule our world on our own without God. Needless to say, our world won’t last long outside Divine design and control. And we are seeing its end in our day, with fire coming in to play its role as the last of the four creative forces. Actually, fire has been in cycle for some time, culminating in the last century and overlapping into the new millennium as the first force of water begins its cycle at the dawn of the Age of Aquarius. Fire and water mixing together creates steam, clouds on planets and steamy emotions in humans the world ’round. Changes are coming on us thick and fast as the old heaven and the old earth pass away to make way for the new heaven and the new earth to put in an appearance. We see these changes everywhere, but nowhere more obvious than on the surface of the planets.
We’ve looked at the changes occurring on Mercury, Mars, Venus and Jupiter, as well as the Sun. Let’s look at the planets farthest out and see what’s happening on them. Then we’ll look at Earth changes in some detail, if not in this post then the next.
Uranus with its rings
By 1998, Hubble had discovered nearly as many clouds in a short time as had ever before been observed in the entire history of Uranus. By 1999, NASA articles were referring to Uranus as being ‘hit’ by ‘huge storms,’ making it ‘a dynamic world with the brightest clouds in the outer solar system.’ The head NASA scientist referred to these increasingly bright and active clouds as ‘really big, big changes’ on Uranus.
“Seasonal brightness” changes on Uranus are “not well understood.” In 2004, thirty large clouds, brighter than ever before, were observed on the planet’s surface, more clouds than had been counted before 2000. A Berkeley NASA scientist used adjectives such as “unprecedented” and “vigorous” in describing activities in the southern hemisphere of Uranus. Carbon monoxide gas was also detected in Uranus’s atmosphere for the first time in 2003, its origins thought to be from dust flowing throughout the solar system. “Dramatic changes” in the planet’s rings were announced in 2007 “including brightness increases, a potentially new ring and a cloud of dust particles pervading the entire ring system.”
Neptune’s “hyperdimensional pole shift”
Neptune’s “Great Dark Spot” suddenly switched from its southern hemisphere to its northern between 1994 and 1995. NASA said they were “near-mirror” images of each other, according to images taken by Voyager 2 of the original spot. NASA scientists were led to say that “Neptune has changed radically since 1989.” Two years later a “looming mystery” was written up by NASA: when the “newly migrated” spot appeared, it seemed to be “trapped at a fixed latitude,” indicating an apparent “perfect geometric shift” has occurred in the grid, as the two latitudes were identical.
By 1996, less than a year after the “hyperdimensional pole shift,” Dr. Lawrence Sromovsky noticed an increase in Neptune’s overall brightness—which continued dramatically increasing through 2002. Blue light became 3.2 percent brighter, red light 5.6 percent brighter and near-infrared light intensified by a whopping 40 percent. Some areas of latitude became fully 100 percent brighter.
Here’s the clincher . . .
The physics to explain such a change is brightness are just not there in the conventional models, since Neptune “seems to run on almost no energy.” Neptune’s south pole was found to be 18 degrees warmer than the rest of the planet in 2007.
Neptune’s moon, Triton, experienced a “very high” 5 percent temperature increase between 1989 and 1998. The is comparable with earth’s atmosphere heating up to twenty-two degrees Fahrenheit in only nine years. It is believed that Triton’s atmospheric pressure has “at least doubled in bulk since the time of the Voyager encounter (in 1989).”
Pluto’s atmospheric pressure increased by 300 percent between 1989 and 2002, resulting in a noticeable surface temperature increase. This was attributed to “seasonal changes.” These climate changes on Pluto are not attributed to those on Earth, nor to those in the Sun, as the planet has been drifting away from the Sun since 1989, and the “Sun’s output is much too steady.”
The scientists suggest “some longer-term change, analogous to long-term climatic changes on Earth” could be responbsible for the massive global warming of Pluto. The Associated Press revealed in February 2010 that Pluto’s colors did not change between 1954 and 2000, but then the red levels became 20 to 30 percent stronger by 2002. In addition, “Nitrogen ice [is] shifting in size and density in surprising ways.”
I suspect that’s enough to digest for now. We’ll look at some of the changes here on Earth in my next post in two weeks. Drop me an email or post your comments on my blog. I always enjoy hearing from my readers, now in 59 different countries throughout the globe. Until then,
Be love. Be loved,
References: Wilcock, David – The Source Field Investigations, 2011.
View this clip for an explanation of the polar shift underway: